How we work
The approach is the point.
Most audit findings are downstream of the same question: does the evidence that what's documented actually happened exist, and does it hold up? Our process is built around that question, in the same shape on every engagement.
- 01
Scope against the actual question
Every engagement starts with a call about what you're trying to assure and who you need to assure it to. The scope is tailored to that — LP satisfaction, board satisfaction, regulator satisfaction, or counterparty satisfaction each require different depth and different evidence. We won't sell you a Level 3 CCSS audit when Level 1 readiness is what closes the current conversation.
- 02
Map existing assurance coverage
Before we assess anything new, we map what your current assurances actually cover: SOC 2 scope, ISO 27001 certificate conditions, smart contract audit perimeters, prior CCSS work, penetration test findings. Most operational risk lives in the seams between these, and the first deliverable is a coverage map that shows where the seams are.
- 03
Request the evidence
We don't audit documentation. We audit documentation against evidence the documentation was followed. Signed runbooks, ceremony attestations, access logs, reconciliation output, redemption tickets, liquidation execution records — whatever operational artifact the documented procedure should have produced, we ask for it on specific dates. Gaps between procedure and artifact are the audit.
- 04
Assess the technical design
Alongside the evidence work, we evaluate the underlying technical design — cryptographic choices, custody architecture, reserve segregation, oracle governance, bridge validator structure, whatever the engagement scope covers. We reference CCSS where it applies and NIST SP 800-90A where random-number generation is in scope, and we note where the design is stronger or weaker than its documentation claims.
- 05
Write the report against the buyer's question
The deliverable is structured around the question that started the engagement. LPs get a report they can file and point to. Boards get a risk picture they can react to. Regulators get evidence organized the way regulators read it. Trust centers get something publishable. No filler, no Executive Summary that repeats the Executive Summary.
- 06
Stay available for the follow-up
Findings don't close themselves. We stay available after the report lands to answer questions from the buyer the report was written for — your LP, your board, your counterparty — and to support remediation when requested. The engagement doesn't end at delivery.
Ready to scope an engagement?
Prefer to schedule directly? Book a call