Talk to us

Solutions / For stablecoin issuers and integrators

Stablecoin operations that stand up to institutional scrutiny.

Stablecoins are becoming the first digital-asset product institutional integrators adopt. The operational standards expected of stablecoin issuers — reserve segregation, attestation look-through, mint-and-burn evidence, redemption mechanics under stress — are converging on what the bank and asset-manager side already demands of its own infrastructure. We audit and advise against that standard.

Who this is for

  • Stablecoin issuers launching a new rail or scaling an existing one past its original operational design
  • Banks integrating stablecoins into custody, payment, or settlement products and needing independent assurance of the issuer before go-live
  • Allocators and counterparties evaluating stablecoin exposure as part of broader risk underwriting
  • Regulators' counterparts seeking operational assurance beyond what the attestation itself provides

What we usually find

Attestations are not audits. An attestation confirms that at a point in time, a stated reserve composition existed. It does not confirm that the workflow that maintained that composition between attestations was controlled, that redemptions executed the way documented procedure said they should, or that mint-and-burn actions left the evidence trail a later reviewer would need to reconstruct them. Those are the gaps we map, and they're where scrutiny is tightening.

How we engage

A typical stablecoin engagement starts with ODD — a coverage map of what the issuer's existing assurances address and what they don't. From there, the specific service mix depends on what surface the engagement scope covers:

Before you launch, integrate, or underwrite

A 30-minute call is usually enough to know whether our scope matches your question.

Prefer to schedule directly? Book a call