Talk to us

Solutions / For tokenization platforms and banks

Tokenization is four audit perimeters. One of them is unaudited.

Tokenized assets involve traditional custody for the underlying, crypto custody for the token, on-chain issuance infrastructure, and an ongoing reconciliation process that keeps the two sides honest. Each of the first three has an audit regime. The reconciliation seam — the one where most operational failures actually happen — doesn't. That's where we work.

Who this is for

  • Tokenization platforms issuing against real-world assets, securities, commodities, or fund interests
  • Banks and asset managers integrating tokenized products into their own custody, distribution, or balance sheet operations
  • Allocators evaluating tokenized exposure as part of portfolio construction or fund structuring
  • Regulators and their advisors evaluating a tokenization program before licensing or approval

What we usually find

Tokenization programs tend to over-invest in smart contract audit and under-invest in operational reconciliation. The contract gets extensive code review; the mechanism that ensures the off-chain asset still matches the on-chain token a month into live operation often depends on a spreadsheet, a Slack message, and a single operations lead's familiarity with both sides. That's the gap we name.

How we engage

A tokenization engagement usually begins with a coverage map — what the traditional custody audit, the smart contract audit, and any broker-dealer or transfer-agent audits actually cover — and then drills into the seams none of them are designed to cross.

Pressure-test a tokenization design

Best time to engage is before the first issuance. Second best is before the first redemption.

Prefer to schedule directly? Book a call